When your stomach is full……….

Beatriz Mercado, SWOP East’s Latin American member and Pledging Action Chilean contact, made a quote a long time a go in my personal blog in response to academic radical feminists that because their bellies are full they have time to worry about patriarchal misogyny.   Of course she is dismissed as not being Chilean, not being female, just being some fabrication of the alleged pro porn, pro trafficking lobby.  Sorry conspiracy theorists, but others have met her.  Jessica Land has seen her via Skype.  Katherine DePasquale has talked to her.  She exists.  As does her willingness to bring condoms to sex workers in Chile.  One of SWOP’s “pro patriarchy” acts.

It seems Beatriz, Amanda, Jessica, Stacey, and a significant number of Chileans are part of some vast underworld according to the powers that be of radical feminism according to Farley, Craft, Tobias, Genderburg, Dufresne, among others.  But than none of them are risking death by having unprotected sex with clients because they can’t get condoms because TVPRA removed the funding to purchase them.  What concerns do Hughes, Farley, Raymond and other academic rad fems have aside from worrying about losing their various high paying positions?

They accuse sex worker rights activists of colluding with the patriarchy by advocating for our human rights.  How are fighting violence and advocating for the right to unionize, the right to end discrimination, the right for equal representation, the right for legal and civil recourse against clients that rape, pimps that cheat, etc.

I would argue these academic radical feminists are helping patriarchy.  They block sex worker rights initiatives, they align with the Bush Administration to block funding for projects that save lives.  They ban us from their conferences, censor us from their blogs.  All in the name of fighting patriarchy.  A caller on a KMUD interview that Amanda Brooks and I recently did called in blathering on about how offended she was that KMUD brought us on, and God forbid let us speak, how we were causing women to be viewed as holes and colluding with patriarchal oppression.  How?   By advocating for our rights?  By bringing a human face to sex workers.  Clearly she did no active listening to what Amanda and I spoke of, instead she had her diatribe ready, launched it and hung up on all of us with the eloquent comment “God Bless KMUD”.  Articulate.

They claim to want to rescue us.  They spend all this time talking about us, inventing studies and stats about us.  Average age of entry into prostitution 13.  How?  90 plus percent of sex workers want out of the sex industry now.  How does one arrive at these numbers?  Saddam won the presidency of Iraq with 104 percent of the vote in the 1990’s too but that doesn’t make it a realistic number.

While there are exceptions.  Radical feminists that are authentic and are trying to fight for social justice.  They are the minority.  To the rest our views should be censored, repressed, blocked, deleted, and “reframed” without any recourse to address blatant factual misrepresentations.  They ask us what we are doing for prostituted women?  We are advocating for their rights, we are spending our own money as we don’t have the US Government funding us to send condoms to Chile in the hopes those condoms arrive and save lives.  What are Hughes, Farley, Raymond, Sam Berg, doing?  When they go into brothels to study the women like laboratory rats.  Are they bringing out those that wished to be rescued?  Or just using them as propaganda to maintain the TVPRA funding stream.

When your belly is full you don’t have to worry about things as simple as s condom to give to a client who wants bareback sex.  When you are the academic researcher you can sit in your big office at URI and talk about the evil clients.  Does this matter to Chilean sex workers?  Do they even know?  Do they care or are their needs much more day to day?  End the sex industry and you end their ability to pay bills, to feed their children.  And replace it with what?

Hypocrites

2 Responses

  1. THANK YOU.

  2. For anyone to say I’m a tool of the patriarchy is absurd.

    I’ve fought, beside rad fems, against the patriarchy for the past decade. I’m a tool of no one other than myself. That’s my choice, and I naively thought that was what I was fighting for in my early twenties.

    Now my voice is silenced and barely relevant as a footnote in popular discourse.

    Who has been yelling at the top of their lungs in order to ensure that I don’t get heard? That is so sisterly and empowering, isn’t it?

    I am following the path that is best for women, globally and domestically. That path is sex workers rights, because sex workers rights are human rights, and without sex workers rights, millions of people will continue to live under inhuman conditions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: