Sex Worker Rights Advocate Blog Launches

More blogs are launching on the subject of sex worker rights! Snip from Sex Worker Rights Advocate:

… 20/20 could have addressed how the criminalization of prostitution compounded the problems Brandi Britton was experiencing and played a major role in “pushing her over the edge” with tragic results. Britton was an escort and a professor who worked for Palfrey…

Like Brandi Britton, many sex workers have been persecuted under these prohibitionist policies toward prostitution and I can only imagine how many more sex workers also committed suicide, as Britton allegedly did, after being persecuted and chastised.

Other sex workers & advocates & allies with blogs, send us your links or leave a comment below. Our blogroll is on its way.

Sunday Afternoon Palfrey Video Roundup

Below the cut, enough Sunday political teevee on prostitution & powertripping to make you want to crawl back into bed with a vibrator. Or, in bed with us bloggers.

First up:


Vlogger Kittycatastrophe on safer sex & the fallout of Tobias’ agenda to end health education to sex workers… while he hires them, of course. “Giving out condoms is apparently against the word of God… I don’t think condoms were around back then, but anyway…”

Continue reading

Working the Intersection Of Sex and Power

Lily Burana
writes in the Washington Post today:

Oh, Deborah Jeane, what are we going to do with you?

Yes, you, Deborah Jeane Palfrey — aka Miz Julia, former proprietress of the alleged escort service Pamela Martin and Associates, the 50-year-old California girl who’s had Washington all a-dither.

   

You surrendered your phone records and took your plight to ABC — all in your own defense, of course. Facing racketeering charges and possible prison time, a girl’s gotta do what a girl’s gotta do.

Full Story

Fox News Says: Legalize Prostitution!

From News Hounds

The first eight minutes of this morning’s (May 5, 2007) “Forbes on Fox,” one of the four shows that comprise Fox’s “Cost of Freedom business news block,” was about the “DC Madam.” Not caring that it was 11:00 a.m. EDT (think: vulnerable little babies using the clicker to look for cartoons), Fox went to a split screen. In the biggest screen, Fox showed a lot of “t” (I guess the “a” part isn’t legal at that time of day). The discussion, which was more of an afterthought since the video of tits was obviously the main “news,” concluded, per the chyron at the bottom of the screen, that prostitution should be legalized. It read: “‘DC Madam’ Lesson: Legalize & Tax Prostitution!”

News: Prostitutes found dead…

I think it is interesting that whenever sex workers are found dead, they are always identified as such. How many times have you seen a headline: “Waiter found dead”? Or, “Accountant found dead”? These people die, but they are not usually identified by their occupation.

Just a thought.

Statement of Sex Worker Human Rights

To end misconceptions about sex worker human rights, here is the SWOP East Sex Worker Human Rights Statement.  Many thanks to Canada’s IUSW for being the inspiration for this statement.

Sex Worker Human Rights

from SWOP East  http://www.swopeast.org

by Jill Brenneman


Ending criminalization of sex work involving consenting adults creates opportunity for positive social change.  With an end to criminalization, sex workers are no longer marginalized for abuse and victimization by customers, the legal system and law enforcement.  Instead, the legal system would serve to protect sex workers, to represent them in the event they are victimized by a crime.  Rather than having to fear the police and be easy targets for renegade cops abusing their positions, sex workers would be able to access assistance from the police just as any other citizen victimized by a crime.  STORM’s website has many testimonials from individuals victimized in the sex industry that had no recourse due to current social views regarding sex work, criminality and the stigma and marginalization that comes with them.


Current policies of criminalization also really serve no value for those either in the sex industry in a non-consenting situation, trafficking victims or those underage.  Those who; coerce, traffic or exploit both adults and youth are aware that criminalization keeps the victims from viewing law enforcement and the legal system as allies to assist them in getting out of the sex industry.  The victim becomes imprisoned by a system that is allegedly setup to protect them.   It is both unrealistic and simplistic not to recognize that people who prey on those who are coerced into the sex industry will use criminalization – the knowledge that the victim fears being punished by the law as a criminal – as reinforcement in a dynamic of fear that makes it difficult for such a victim to leave. Predators use criminalization and the legal system to coerce and deny access to people under their influence who want to leave the sex industry.


The right to form and join professional associations and unions allows for empowerment of sex workers to have greater authority and rights within the sex industry through the strength of a group and networking.



Sex Work, Taxation, and Representation.


Currently the Internal Revenue Service requires individuals to report income earned from illegal sources.  Criminalization denies the sex worker access to legal rights and representation related to taxation as admission of how the income is earned may not be covered under client privilege.  This causes denial of the ability to receive accurate and complete legal rights and representation.   Ending criminalization would allow the sex worker to fulfill requirements of paying taxes, consult with tax specialists without fear of the session being used against them in court.



Coercion, violence, sexual abuse, child labor, rape and racism.


Sex workers should be entitled to protection from coercion, violence, sexual abuse, child labor, rape and racism just as any employee in any citizen working in any occupation in the United States of America is.  Coercion is enforced by criminalization.  Knowing that turning in the coercing party may lead to the sex worker being arrested is a substantial barrier from leaving a coercive situation.  Those that coerce are aware of this dynamic realizing the victim has little recourse to escape the coercion through the legal system without significant risk.  The victim is likely to think of themselves as a criminal because of current laws and social attitudes and to see the legal system and law enforcement not as those that can bring justice but as those who will likely arrest, prosecute and further victimize the person they should be protecting.


Sexual abuse and rape in sex work is virtually unaddressed as an issue.   Social attitudes most often assume sex workers can not be sexually abused, assaulted or raped by virtue of being a sex worker.   Sex workers are at very significant risk of sexual abuse and rape.  Exchange of money for agreed upon services does not negate the fact that anything beyond what the sex worker consents to is rape.  Payment of money or anything else of value is not a blank check to force any sexual act upon a sex worker.  Yet, current legalities and social attitudes make bringing a rapist of a sex worker to justice virtually impossible.  Many rape crisis centers either will not accept clients that are sex workers or are improperly trained to assist them.  Medical care providers are also often improperly trained or not trained at all to deal with rape and sexual assault of sex workers.  This along with criminalization leaves the sex worker often unable or unwilling to access medical services after an assault.  Sex workers are easy targets for violence.  Violent offenders realize the marginalization and criminalization aspects of sex work leave the sex worker with little legal recourse in the event of being victimized by violence.  Violence sometimes extends all the way to the murder of the sex worker with little legal interest as in the case of the Green River Killer, Gary Ridgeway who killed dozens of prostitutes before finally being caught.  Had the victims been seen as “regular women” rather than prostitutes there would likely have been a much higher emphasis on the capture and prosecution of the killer.


One of the most controversial topics is child labor related to the sex industry.  The vast majority of youth in the sex industry in the US are runaway/throwaway youth.  There is a significant issue that often goes unaddressed.  Critics will state that youth should not be in the sex industry.  They are correct.  However, this requires more than press releases, position statements and pusillanimous policies of government.  The youth that are in the sex industry often have no other way to earn money.  They are in a situation of survival sex which is trading sex for survival needs.  It is nothing short of a waste of time to state this problem exists without concrete solutions.  Suggestions advising the youth to just go home are unrealistic.  Often times the youth left for a reason, the street was safer than home or where thrown out.  Going home may not be an option.  Suggestions advising them to go to the local McDonald’s or like employer and get a “normal job” are absurd.  Where do they get the work permits?  What do they list as an address on the job application?  What telephone number do they give for the job application?  What do they do while they are waiting for this “normal job” to consider and process their application?  Unless resources are created which provide food, clothing, shelter and education this will always be a problem.


In many countries outside the US, child labor is a different issue.  Families so poor they have no choice but to either have the children work in the sex industry or even sell children into the sex trade are common scenarios.  The basic issue is poverty and often sexism as the male child is considered more valuable, the female child more easily dispensable into the sex industry.  Children are not a tourist attraction and it is the responsibility of governments to address this issue including the governments of the “first world” countries to punish their citizens that engage in child sex tours.  It is simplistic to blame the parents of these children.  Poverty has to be addressed as a global issue.  Also, often unaddressed is the myth that a job in a sweatshop making minimal money for epic work hours is a better option for children or anyone for that matter.  Both amount to little more than slave labor.


Compounding the problem is current the US Governments ban on funding unless organizations helping child sex labor victims unless they take a specific anti prostitution pledge.  This is absurd.  The problem isn’t going to be legislated away with a quick stroke of the pen, a nice photo op, with mission accomplished written as the answer to this problem.  Access to needed resources including medical attention, prophylactics, and education on sexually transmitted diseases are being denied by an alleged effort to fight human trafficking by cutting off funding to agencies that “collaborate with traffickers”.  Until the issues of poverty and other factors are addressed in realistic form, this is going to be a problem.  Denial of service for political gain through the December 19, 2003: Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2003 is nothing but a disingenuous play to convince the world that a social problem is being addressed.  What is really happening is an unrealistic US Government has aligned with some feminists and the religious right to posture about fighting trafficking while their actions endanger and often end the lives of victims around the world.  Victims supposedly helped by this legislation.



Legal support or sex workers who want to sue those who exploit their labor.


The focus on fighting to end the sex industry and continuing to maintain the status quo of criminalization places too much emphasis on the punishment of men that are either pimps or clients.  Forgotten is both the reality that women and transgendered bear the brunt of arrests.  Also lost in the fight to end the sex industry is the reality that criminalization takes away civil remedies for sex workers that are exploited for their labor.  The current social and legal environment empowers those who exploit the labor of sex workers as criminalization leaves no option for legal recourse.  Knowing the legal and social implications of sex workers attempting a lawsuit to gain compensation for exploitation of their labor, those who exploit have little to fear in using current circumstances to their advantage.  This leaves the sex worker vulnerable to inadequate payment for doing their job, exploited by having to pay a series of fees to work such as in the case of many strip clubs, overtime pay laws become irrelevant as many sex workers are not even paid an hourly wage but instead tips and only after paying fees to club management, bartenders, security, disc jockeys and other staff.  In the event the sex worker suffers exploitation or harm there is little ability to sue for financial, physical or emotional damages.  In the event of workplace injury there is often no workers compensation, disability pay or other benefits.


Ending criminalization would allow for labor rights allowing sex workers to file suit against those who exploit their labor, to seek compensation for various forms of damages, fair compensation for their work, legal benefits in the event of injury resulting from accident or negligence on the part of the employer and a much stronger legal remedy having the effect of keeping potentially predatory employers accountable for their actions.



Clean and safe places to work


Ending criminalization would bring sex work out from underground.  Without fear of arrest, incarceration, criminal record and other legal issues, sex workers would have the same legal protections as an employee of any other industry.  Rather than having to fear law enforcement, it would become the police’s responsibility to enforce the same laws and same rights afforded employees of other industries.  Ending criminalization, stigmatization, marginalization and other forms of isolation and discrimination would provide opportunities for clean, safe work environments, access to medical services without fear of being victimized by the judgment of the medical provider or denial of services due to their occupation.  Ending criminalization would allow for the same laws which protect workers in other industries from workplace hazards to be enforced providing clean and safe work environments for sex workers.


The right to choose whether to work on our own or co-operatively with other sex workers.


Current legal environments in various countries, states, provinces and municipalities either force sex workers to work together as in the case of legalized brothels in some counties in Nevada, or to not be able to work together in other areas fearing it would bring too much awareness and catch the attention of law enforcement.  Sex workers need to have the right to choose their work environment just as any other individual does.  That choice may be to work for an employer, to work as an independent or to create their own business of the size they choose.



The absolute right to say no.


One of the greatest flaws of criminalization is the absolute lack of protection from clients or employers refusing to respect the sex workers boundaries.  There is virtually no recourse for a sex worker forced into sexual acts against their will either by a client that exceeds the agreed upon terms or an employer that forces the sex worker to go beyond personal boundaries as part of their job.  The exchange of money does not eliminate the sex workers right to say no, it does not give a client the right to exceed the sex workers boundaries and does not give the employer the right to force a sex worker to engage in sexual acts against their will, ones they consider dangerous or simply ones they do not feel comfortable with.  Sex workers have the right to their own bodies and if and when that is violated they need the right to recourse.  Current legal and social stances often deny the sex worker the right to control what happens to their bodies. 

Brian Ross Back-pedals on Statement About White House

From: SilentPatriot at Crooks and Liars

(You can view the video at that link)

Last week:

“There are thousands of names, tens of thousands of phone numbers, and there are people there at the Pentagon, lobbyists, others at the White House, prominent lawyers — a long, long list.

But last night on “20/20,” Ross completely reversed course and said:

As usually is the case in Washington, much of it is dull. There are no members of Congress we can find in these phone numbers, no White House officials. Quite frankly, but for the few exceptions, most of the men on this list just aren’t newsworthy.

What accounts for that sudden shift? A week ago the White House was involved, but now they’re not? The last thing I want is anyone falsely accused of anything, but how did an extra week with the phone records lead Ross to conclude that people who he last week said were involved no longer aren’t? That’s just weird if you ask me.”

Karly writes:

Of course there was somebody in the White House. By announcing in their teasers that they’ve got “…others in the White House,” wouldn’t you expect that somebody got concerned and made some calls? They ought to check out the calendars and corresponding phone records of all the lobbyists on that list. That would be extremely informative. I have no doubt that high-level politicians of all allegiances can be traced back to that agency and any of the other similar agencies in the DC region.

One of the theories that I’ve heard from successful women who’ve worked in the DC area is that it’s a very lucrative region because so many politicians spend half of their time there, away from their family and hometowns. People always feel more comfortable indulging when they’re away from home, plus the loneliness and high-stress job factors.

Very few women that I’ve ever met have had a lot of good things to say about their politician clients. They’re always high-maintenance and always want to pay as little as possible are common complaints that I’ve heard about them. Even so- you’d think that Palfrey would have been better off had she not insulted Ullman publicly on top of outing him as a client. Someone mused the other day about whether Palfrey was selectively choosing the most annoying clients to expose…